I did a Networking exam yesterday. It had a True/False section with 60 T/F questions, with a twist: wrong answers take away half the points of a correct answer.
This is a very common practice in my country, not sure if it's done anywhere else.
As an example, let's say you have 2 T/F questions, each worth 1 point. If you:
- answer both questions right you'll have 2 pts (+1 + 1)
- answer 1 question correctly and leave the other blank you'll have 1 pt (1 + 0)
- answer both questions and get 1 right and 1 wrong, you'll have 0.5 pts (+ 1 - 0.5)
- leave both questions blank you'll have (0 pts)
- answer both questions and get both wrong you'll have -1 pts (-0.5 + (-0.5)). Some universities allow negative points, some just clamp it at 0 pts.
In the beginning of the exam sheet, there was a warning: "If you are unsure of the correct answer LEAVE IT BLANK, as wrong answers take away half of a right answer's points".
At first I was following this advice and only answering questions when I was sure the answer was correct.
But then I gave it some thought: in the long run, doesn't it still payoff to guess randomly, instead of not answering?
If I do, I have a 50% chance of + 1 pt, and a 50% chance of -0.5 pts. This means the average expected gain over a large enough number of questions is +0.5 pts.
If I don't answer the question at all, I'll get +0 pts in the long run.
So it is better to answer randomly, than to leave them blank. Is my reasoning correct?
When the exam ended, I exposed this reasoning to the supervising professor. He dismissed it as unimportant :c. However, I think this is important because, if I am correct, the exam sheet is misinforming the students and advising them to take a suboptimal strategy.