Proportionality in series’ with exponents

## 3 Answers

Don’t think you could derive a similar result because exponentiation is not linear like multiplication. Your result follows from

∑n^a =: S,

∑kn^a = k∑n^a = kS

and

kS = S ⇒ [S = 0] ∪ [k = 1].

But

∑(n^(a))^k = ∑n^(ka),

from where you could conclude that

k = 1 ⇒ ∑n^(ka) = ∑n^a = S

(the converse might not be true; there might be other cases which give

∑n^(ka) = S

without k equalling 1). Not sure the S = 0 bit would hold, and I can’t think of another result you could derive from there.
[removed]
Fix n and a. Since the series converges then a < 0. Notice that n^ak is monotonic decreasing in k - if you increase k, you strictly decrease n^ak. Thus as you increase k, every term in the series shrinks, so the sum must shrink too. The same argument holds when decreasing k and the sum growing. Thus the sums cannot be the same if k is not the same and in particular there is no k that gives the same sum as the case k=1

## Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
79 answers
Regretting majoring in math
0 like 0 dislike
5 answers
Is there a nice way to recast riemannian geometry in terms of principal bundles?
0 like 0 dislike
3 answers
Is there any reason to believe that big unsolved conjectures are either provable / disprovable in ZFC?
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
Website counting publications in x field, by institution?
0 like 0 dislike
7 answers
Quantitatively speaking, which subject area in mathematics is currently the most research active?