0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
Algebraic geometry via universal domain
by

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
In the modern approach using scheme theory, Weil's approach is   
encapsulated in the following observation. Given a finite type scheme X   
over K and a point x in X, the residue field K(x) of the local ring   
O\_{X,x} is a finitely generated field extension of K, hence it admits an  
 embedding K(x) --> Omega (sorry I seem to have a problem with encoding and cannot get Omega to work properly in this answer box). This corresponds in turn to a morphism Spec(Omega)-->X with image x. In other words, the map X(Omega) --> |X| from the Omega-points of X to the set of points of the scheme X is **surjective**.

You can then take the preimage of the Zariski topology on |X| to X(Omega) and get a topology on X(Omega). What Weil did was basically to work directly with this topology.  

I would recommend learning directly the language of varieties and then schemes, and not spend any time with Weil's approach until you can make sense of the previous paragraphs - and then you will see that this approach, while historically important, is completely superseded by the language of schemes.
0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
If you read the very next sentence of the Wikipedia article, it elaborates that Zariski did not like having two points that were topologically indistinguishable. This seems quite a reasonable assumption to put on spaces: if there is literally no topological way to distinguish two points, how on Earth can we say they are the same? We need to be leaving set theory, not going more towards it!
by

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
79 answers
coL_Punisher asked Jun 21
Regretting majoring in math
coL_Punisher asked Jun 21
0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
61 answers
_spunkki asked Jun 21
Just ordered a Klein Bottle from Cliff Stoll. He sent me about 2 dozen pictures of him packing it up. Why is he so cute :)
_spunkki asked Jun 21
0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
21 answers
Brands_Hatch asked Jun 21
Is set theory dying?
Brands_Hatch asked Jun 21
0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
2 answers
a_dalgleish asked Jun 21
Contributing to the right math area, If all areas are equally curious
a_dalgleish asked Jun 21
0 like 0 dislike
0 like 0 dislike
5 answers
BrianDenver7 asked Jun 21
Is there a nice way to recast riemannian geometry in terms of principal bundles?
BrianDenver7 asked Jun 21

24.8k questions

103k answers

0 comments

33.7k users

OhhAskMe is a math solving hub where high school and university students ask and answer loads of math questions, discuss the latest in math, and share their knowledge. It’s 100% free!